This is part personal story and part information gathering.
I started doing 5:2 in January 2014 and have stuck with it ever since. After trying different permutations I discovered that not eating breakfast, then having a light lunch or frequently no lunch, followed by a light dinner is a good way to stay under 600 calories on the two restricted calorie days – with plenty of water and hot drinks to ward off any hunger pangs.
About two weeks ago, and as an experiment, I thought I’d try not having breakfast every day. So far, and having got used to not “expect” a meal shortly after waking up, I’ve found it remarkably easy. Like with other permutations of 5:2, I experienced a period of adaptation and in particular the realisation that my early morning hunger pangs do not signal an essential need to eat. I now appear to have readily adapted to this change and will make it permanent.
Many people’s typical reaction, when I say I don’t eat breakfast, is a comment that it would not work for them. Anecdotal reactions to not having breakfast include dizziness, nausea, irritability and so on. This got me wondering about the extent to which these reactions are because the person has got used to expecting calories in the morning and therefore could change if their habits changed, or whether this is a hardwired physiological reaction and would always happen no matter what. Intuitively it seems unlikely that a person couldn’t adapt. Then again, the many people I have spoken with are completely convinced that they must eat or face unwelcome consequences.
So, my question is, if you are someone who feels they must have breakfast, to what extent have you tested this? How many times have you tried delaying your first meal of the day? Do you always experience an unwelcome physical reaction?
I am also curious in other people’s experiences and thoughts, and if you have any research or scientific insights to offer, the even better.
2:39 pm
21 Jan 15