In the now less-widely held view that a calorie is a calorie, fat-free, low fat or reduced fat products seemed like a panacea, since you could have the food you want with fewer calories. Fewer calories = weight loss.
However, a much more prevalent view these days is that actually your full-fat stuff is better; full fat mayo, cheese, yoghurt etc etc. The reasons given that I’ve heard are:
1) Fat is not inherently bad. Your body needs it, and it helps you feel fuller for longer as it takes longer to digest.
2) The stuff that replaces the fat might be bad. It might be sugar or other simple carbs, spiking your insulin levels which makes you gain fat and feel hungry again in no time.
3) It tastes better (especially the cheese. Try melting low fat cheddar. That ain’t cheese).
I wonder how this can then relate to the 5:2 way of eating… I’m quite tempted to say you should never go for the reduced fat option, except with milk since the fat isn’t replaced by something else.
On your feed days, having full fat foods will a) make you happy, as you can enjoy them guilt-free. This is the beauty of 5:2. The thought gets me through fast days! b) Help you feel full, stabilise blood sugar and prevent you craving junk food and over-eating.
On fast days, I don’t know how many of us go for food that has a ‘reduced fat’ version. There’s nothing in my meals today that could be… no such thing as reduced fat eggs, banana, haddock fillet and vegetables! However, if you’re going to have something like greek yoghurt, can I encourage you to not go for the fat free version? You might have to have a slightly smaller portion to stay within your calorie limit, but it will be healthier, keep you full longer and provide a more balanced nutritional profile, rather than the carb-heavy profile of reduced fat products.
Anyone think differently?
6:16 pm
13 Jan 14