Hi all,
I am sure this information is out there somewhere in this forum, but there is so much information to sift through that I have not found it.
I have been on 5:2 and then 6:1 for 6+ years and feel fantastic on it. Mainly, my cholesterol went back to normal from having been slightly elevated and I have found a fantastic way in 6:1 of maintaining the weight and my body composition. I sense that my short-term memory is much better than in the past. Glucose and other heart-related measurements were fortunately not an issue to me, and the 6:1 regime keeps my IGF at a low level, at about 120 where the normal range for my age (40) is 100-220.
Still, with all the attention that has come with Valter Longo’s most recent findings, I am wondering if I am wasting my time or even risking my health with this… On a fasting day, which is effectively a cycle of about 36 hours, I have one meal in the evening of about 700 calories. I have added a few more calories to it to aid sleep, so I do not stick to the recommended 600 calories for men. I also do 16:8 twice per week. By chance, I am getting my internal organs checked with ultrasound every year at work and there is no indication at all of any gall stones, which is an ailment Mr Longo mentioned.
Questions, for which I would be very grateful if anyone could answer:
1) Does anyone have a comprehensive list of any actual benefits of a full day fast, or effectively anything that is not the 5 day fast that is promoted by the Longevity Diet (which I have not read yet)? Mr Longo makes it sound as though it is a waste of time or dangerous, but I am thinking that although clearly that will have no impact on stem cell regeneration, it should come with at least some apophagy? I have just water and black coffee for effectively 22-24h, from Sunday evening to Monday evening, before the light meal mentioned above.
2) Given that I have done this for 6 years now and (at least so far!) have no indication that my gall bladder would be impacted, I am not particularly worried about that, but if skipping breakfast truly impacts your risk of heart disease, what would the indication of that be? 6 years on, cholesterol and blood pressure look great; glucose has always been low; weight and fat percentage are certainly not a problem. Given how long I have been on this, I am not particularly worried; I just sense that it is so weird that what looked so promising in “Eat, fast and live longer” now appears to be quite wrong, at least beyond the impact on weight. There has to be a more nuanced version “out there” with some, but certainly not all, of the benefits you experienced with a prolonged fasting.I just do not see myself doing such a prolonged fasting; 6:1 is much more doable for me alongside kids, work and about 3 hours of exercising a week.
6 years on, I am also very happy to share my experience with anyone – it is doable to follow this regime over time! I feel so good on it and how it impacts also my mind.
Thanks.
12:44 pm
8 Oct 18