I have a minor procedure this afternoon that requires me to have liquids only today so am taking the opportunity to start 5:2 which has interested me for a while.
While technically “overweight” (who isn’t?) I excercise regularly (running & gym), eat healthy most of the time but do drink way too much, eat out too often and seek solace (from what I’ve no idea!) in large bags of crisps on many evenings.
I’ve been 13 to 13 and a half stone for years (I’m 5″10), dropped down to 12 and a half for a few months about 2 years ago when I was running a lot (10k races) but have been stuck above 13 & a half for the last year or so despite moving up to a half marathon in October.
Recently I topped 14st for the 1st time in nearly 20 years!
This morning I was 13st 11, I last ate at about 8pm last night and had no booze yesterday.
A few questions….
What’s the reason for 600 cals as opposed to zero?
Is it a case of “you can have 600 cals if you need to to keep yourself sane” but nothing would be even better?
Or does the small amount of food on fast days offer some additional health and weight loss benefits over and above what zero would? Eg, the protein preserving muscle?
I.e. is it important to have the 600 cals and not so good not to?
I think I can go without breakfast after last eating at 7pm the night before and eat two 300 cal meals at maybe 3pm and 7pm.
Would I be right in thinking that this longer first 18 hours without eating (7pm until 3pm the following day) followed by 12 (mainly asleep) might be more beneficial than 12 hours (7pm til 7am) then another 12 (7am to 7pm) followed by another 12 (7pm to 7am) mainly asleep?
Or is it the opposite!?
I read “whatever works best for you” a lot – which is one of the great things about IF – but what is the absolute OPTIMUM way of doing this? (and don’t say “whatever works best for you! ;))
12:32 pm
16 Mar 17