Hi all. I did the 5:2 diet a few years ago with very good results. At some point I hit a plateau, gave up, and over several years gained it all back. This summer I went on the Fast Metabolism diet because two friends highly recommended it. I lost 10 pounds the first month, then hit a plateau. I gradually abandoned it and have gained that weight back.
The 5:2 diet made more intuitive sense to me and it was much easier to follow. The FMD diet involves very complicated meal planning and shopping. You eat 5X a day and vary what you’re eating to “fool” your metabolism and get it burning faster again. It also eliminates a lot of things: no dairy, no wheat, no caffeine, no alcohol. So it’s a “clean food” diet and eliminates foods that slow down your metabolism. I’m 55 and my metabolism has slowed way down so this appealed to me.
However, I can’t see myself giving up these food categories forever, and the complicated menus are hard to juggle when I’m very busy at work. It became a full time job to shop and plan.
So I’m contemplating the 5:2 diet again and maybe combining it with FMD in this way: on the “off” days, to eat those clean foods as much as possible. My issue is that these two diets seem to be based on totally different science. FMD says you have to feed your metabolism to fire it up and that fasting is bad for you, while 5:2 says just the opposite.
Any thoughts?
1:07 pm
1 Jan 18